Bioelectricity  ·  Article

Cell cycle modulation of gap junction permeability and intercellular heterogeneity

Cell cycle stage changes the electrical state of a cell and, according to Glen, McDevitt and Kemp (2018), how freely it exchanges material with its neighbours. They proposed that, because gap junction connectivity varies with the cycle, a dividing population is a source of dynamic heterogeneity.8 Earlier work had already shown that membrane voltage shifts as cells pass through the cycle.34

Earliest held
1926, Crile, G. W.
Most discussed in
Dynamic intercellular transport modulates the…, 2018
In the library
234 passages in 59 works
Rewritten
2026-10-23
01

Early links to growth

Crile (1926) recorded that observers agreed the most rapid nuclear growth comes shortly before mitosis, while cytoplasmic growth stays comparatively steady.1 That is a structural link between timing in the cycle and cell state. Urrego and colleagues (2014) describe an early finding that resting membrane potential correlates with mitotic activity. Holding Chinese hamster ovary cells at a fixed hyperpolarized value completely inhibited DNA synthesis, and cycling returned when the potential was released.2 Muscle cells and neurons, which are very hyperpolarized, typically show little or no mitotic activity.2

02

Voltage through the cycle

Rao and colleagues (2015) credit Clarence Cone with observing in sarcoma cells a transient hyperpolarization before mitosis, followed by rapid depolarization through M phase.3 Desoyer and colleagues (2026) give a staged summary: quiescent cells are generally hyperpolarised, depolarisation accompanies G1 entry, hyperpolarisation supports S phase, and depolarisation rises again at G2/M.4 The accounts differ in where they place the changes around mitosis. For a mechanism, Urrego and colleagues describe loss of Kv10.1 K+ conductance at G2/M in Xenopus oocytes, which may produce the depolarization seen in mitosis.5 Sundelacruz, Levin and Kaplan (2008) cite a fibroblast study in which NHE1 activity raised intracellular pH and set the timing of G2/M.6

03

Nocodazole as a tool

Nocodazole interferes with microtubule polymerization.7 Vandenberg, Pennarola and Levin (2011) used it in Xenopus embryos as a cytoskeletal reference drug when testing whether vibration disrupts left-right patterning through the same pathway.7 Glen and colleagues used it for a different purpose. They arrested cells at G2/M, removed the drug, and sampled before, immediately after, and 45 minutes after treatment. This gave asynchronous, G2/M-synchronized and mixed G1 and G2/M populations.8 They noted that microtubule depolymerization can affect other cellular processes. To limit this, they identified mitotic cells with Hoechst staining instead of relying on the drug alone.8

04

Transport by cell cycle stage

Glen and colleagues measured recovery constants for intercellular transport. The asynchronous population gave a unimodal distribution, mostly S-phase cells at about 60%. Mitotic cells had recovery constants about 50% larger on average, meaning slower transport, which the authors say agrees with earlier literature.9 The recovered population mostly showed fast transport. From this the authors deduced that G1 is fast and G2/M slow.9 Rounded cell shape matched each slow case. On this basis, they argue that the cycle creates changing differences in connectivity within a pluripotent network.89

SourcesEach quotation was checked word for word against the passage it opens.
  1. All observers are agreed that the most rapid nuclear growth occurs shortly before mitosis.Crile, G. W., 1926 · A Bipolar Theory of Living Processes · open at passage 519
  2. activity of the Na+-H+ exchanger NHE1 caused an increase in intracellular pH, which regulated the timing of the cell cycle G2/M transition and resulted in cell proliferationSundelacruz S, Levin M, Kaplan DL, 2008 · Membrane potential controls adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of… · open at passage 5
  3. we first performed epistasis experiments to determine whether vibration was affecting the same pathway as nocodazole, which interferes with microtubule polymerizationVandenberg LN, Pennarola BW, Levin M, 2011 · Low frequency vibrations disrupt left-right patterning in the Xenopus embryo · open at passage 18
  4. forcing the membrane potential of Chinese hamster ovary cells to a fixed hyperpolarized value completely inhibited DNA synthesis measured as [3H]thymidine incorporation, while cycling was recovered upon release of the potentialUrrego D, Tomczak AP, Zahed F, Stühmer W, Pardo LA, 2014 · Potassium channels in cell cycle and cell proliferation · open at passage 4
  5. The resulting net loss of K+ conductance at G2/M transition may be a way to achieve membrane depolarization associated with mitosis.Urrego D, Tomczak AP, Zahed F, Stühmer W, Pardo LA, 2014 · Potassium channels in cell cycle and cell proliferation · open at passage 20
  6. it was observed that Vm underwent a transient hyperpolarization before entering mitosis, followed by a rapid depolarization through the M Phase suggesting that Vm varies through the cell cycle progressionRao VR, Perez-Neut M, Kaja S, Gentile S, 2015 · Voltage-gated ion channels in cancer cell proliferation · open at passage 4
  7. Given the capability of the cell cycle to modulate GJ connectivity and the rapid cycling time of pluripotent cells, we hypothesized that the cell cycle was a source of dynamic heterogeneity within the pluripotent-intercellular network.Glen CM, McDevitt TC, Kemp ML, 2018 · Dynamic intercellular transport modulates the spatial patterning of… · open at passage 10
  8. by establishing that G1-phase and G2/M-phase produce fast and slow transport rates, respectivelyGlen CM, McDevitt TC, Kemp ML, 2018 · Dynamic intercellular transport modulates the spatial patterning of… · open at passage 12
  9. Quiescent cells are generally hyperpolarised; depolarisation accompanies entry into the G1 phase; hyperpolarisation supports DNA synthesis in the S phase; and further depolarisation occurs during the G2/M transition.Desoyer C, Šupe R, Ghorbanpour S, Goswami D, Khalaj M…, 2026 · Cancer: A bioelectric disease? · open at passage 12
Linked ideas
Gap junctionspart of / contains
Gap junctions are the channels whose cycle-dependent connectivity is at issue in the Glen work.
Covers ion channel control of cell cycle progression, the voltage and K+ channel side of the same stage-dependent changes.
Voltage shifts through G1, S and G2/M are the electrical counterpart to stage-dependent transport.
Proliferating and malignant cells are described as more depolarised, with the cycle adding dynamic variation.
Dynamic changes in gap junction connectivity bear on how such networks could change their own coupling.
Nocodazole serves as a cytoskeletal reference drug in Xenopus left-right patterning experiments.
Both treat membrane voltage as a regulator in non-excitable cells. The passages tie voltage to the cell cycle, with depolarization/hyperpolarization alternating and hyperpolarization causing arrest, but don't link it directly to stem cell potency or differenti
Ion channels and pumpspart of / contains
Passages say ion channels maintain the membrane potential, which oscillates (depolarizes/hyperpolarizes) across the cell cycle; B's cycle-driven voltage differences between neighbouring cells build on A's channel-set voltage.
Passages show cells alternate between hyperpolarization and depolarization over the cell cycle (Chernet, George, Cervera), so A's voltage shifts underlie B's cell-cycle-dependent voltage changes and resulting cell-to-cell differences.
Where it is discussedPassages matching cell cycle, gap junction permeability, intercellular transport, nocodazole
2018Dynamic intercellular transport modulates the spatial patterning of… · Glen CM, McDevitt TC, Kemp ML23
2014Potassium channels in cell cycle and cell proliferation · Urrego D, Tomczak AP, Zahed F, Stühmer…18
2022Ion Channel Drugs Suppress Cancer Phenotype in NG108-15 and U87 Cells: Toward… · Mathews J, Kuchling F, Baez-Nieto D…18
2022Mechanisms Underlying Influence of Bioelectricity in Development · George LF, Bates EA13
2026Cancer: A bioelectric disease? · Desoyer C, Šupe R, Ghorbanpour S…13
2013Membrane potential and cancer progression · Yang M, Brackenbury WJ11
2015Voltage-gated ion channels in cancer cell proliferation · Rao VR, Perez-Neut M, Kaja S, Gentile S10
2019Somatic multicellularity as a satisficing solution to the prediction-error… · Fields C, Levin M9
2016Genome-wide analysis reveals conserved transcriptional responses downstream of… · Pai VP, Martyniuk CJ, Echeverri K…8
2018Emerging Roles of the Membrane Potential: Action Beyond the Action Potential · Abdul Kadir L, Stacey M, Barrett-Jolley…8