Aggregation of protoplasm in Drosera tentacle cells
Aggregation of protoplasm is the clumping of the cell contents of a plant into discrete masses after stimulation. Darwin gave it a long chapter in Insectivorous Plants (1875), concerning gland and tentacle cells.1 He treated it as a visible response of living matter, with its own causes, movements and reversal.23
- Earliest held
- 1875, Darwin, C.
- Most discussed in
- Insectivorous Plants, 1875
- In the library
- 120 passages in 5 works
- Rewritten
- 2026-11-06
Darwin's chapter outline
The chapter opens with the nature of the cell contents before aggregation and the various causes that excite it. It states that the process commences within the glands and travels down the tentacles.1 Later headings cover the aggregated masses and their spontaneous movements, and currents of protoplasm along the cell walls.2 What the list shows is the order of his inquiry: the resting state, the triggers, the spread, then the movements.12
Ammonia and other agents
The headings name carbonate of ammonia as a main agent. They say that granules in the protoplasm flowing along the walls coalesce with the central masses.2 They also record the minuteness of the quantity of carbonate of ammonia that causes aggregation. Other ammonia salts, other substances, organic fluids, water and heat are listed in turn.2 The list ends with redissolution of the masses and the proximate causes of aggregation, followed by a summary and supplementary observations on roots.3 In The Power of Movement in Plants (1880), Darwin applied the same test to other tissue. Hairs on clover calyces were placed in a weak ammonia solution. Their contents became aggregated and then showed the usual slow movements.4
Ammonia on whole leaves
The 1880 work also records ammonia acting on a whole leaf. A drop of carbonate of ammonia solution was placed on the disc of a leaf. Darwin reported that it blackened the glands and induced inflection of many tentacles.5 The leaf was followed afterwards. By the end, the tentacles had re-expanded and the glands had recovered their proper colour.5
Later uses of the term
Later authors use aggregation in related senses. Child (1915) asked whether a particular aggregation of protoplasmic substance is an individual or merely an aggregation, and called this sometimes difficult to settle.6 Bayliss (1915) discussed whether stainable bodies in nerve cells were present as aggregated masses or diffused. He judged the diffuse view more probable and cited Mott and Marinesco, who saw no such bodies in living cells.7 Meyer, Ansorge and Nakagaki (2017) describe the slime mold plasmodium as an aggregate of protoplasm with a gel phase forming tube walls and a sol phase flowing within.8
Nature of the contents of the cells before aggregation — Various causes which excite aggregation — The process commences within the glands and travels down the tentacles
Darwin, C., 1875 · Insectivorous Plants · open at passage 1Currents of protoplasm along the walls of the cells — Action of carbonate of ammonia — The granules in the protoplasm which flows along the walls coalesce with the central masses
Darwin, C., 1875 · Insectivorous Plants · open at passage 80Redissolution of the aggregated masses — Proximate causes of the aggregation of the protoplasm — Summary and concluding remarks — Supplementary observations on aggregation in the roots of plants.
Darwin, C., 1875 · Insectivorous Plants · open at passage 80their proto- plasmic contents immediately became aggregated and afterwarda displayed the usual slow movements.
Darwin, C., 1880 · The Power of Movement in Plants · open at passage 1010a drop of a solution of carbonate of ammonia (2 gr. to 1 oz. of water) was placed on the disc, and this blackened the glands and in- duced inflection of many of the tentacles.
Darwin, C., 1880 · The Power of Movement in Plants · open at passage 474it is sometimes difficult to determine whether a particular aggregation of protoplasmic substance is an individual in the biological sense or merely an aggregation.
Child, C. M., 1915 · Individuality in Organisms · open at passage 15Mott (1912) and Marinesco (1912, see page 470 below), in fact, have shown, by observations on living nerve cells under dark ground illumination, that there are neither Nissl bodies nor neurofibrils in the living state.
Bayliss, W. M., 1915 · Principles of General Physiology · open at passage 76The protoplasm is differentiated into two phases: a gel phase (ectoplasm) that makes up the walls of the tubular structures, and a sol phase (endoplasm) that flows within the tubes.
Meyer B, Ansorge C, Nakagaki T, 2017 · The role of noise in self-organized decision making by the true slime mold… · open at passage 8
| 1875 | Insectivorous Plants · Darwin, C. | 114 |
| 1880 | The Power of Movement in Plants · Darwin, C. | 3 |
| 2017 | The role of noise in self-organized decision making by the true slime mold… · Meyer B, Ansorge C, Nakagaki T | 1 |
| 1915 | Individuality in Organisms · Child, C. M. | 1 |
| 1915 | Principles of General Physiology · Bayliss, W. M. | 1 |