Morphogenesis and form  ·  Article

Evolution of segmentation and expression domains in body plan patterning

Segmentation is the repetition of body units along an axis. Expression domains are the regions of an embryo where particular genes are active. Early authors catalogued segments and asked how they arose. Later work in Drosophila measured how gene domains form and how precisely their borders are placed. Recent simulations ask how networks that make segments and domains can evolve368.

Earliest held
1859, Darwin
Most discussed in
Materials for the Study of Variation Treated…, 1894
In the library
979 passages in 89 works
Rewritten
2026-10-28
01

Early observations

Bateson's 1894 catalogue of variation indexed changes in the number of segments in arthropods, alongside homoeosis in appendages and axial duplicity1. Morgan (1901) described how annelids regenerate. In regeneration from the posterior end of a piece of an earthworm, new segments form just in front of the terminal segment, and the youngest lies next to it. The process continues until the full complement is made up2. Rádl (1930) summarised the classification of the evolutionary morphologists. In that classification, differentiated segmentation in insects is a higher stage than the simple repetition seen in annelids5.

02

Competing theories of origin

Child (1921) noted that annelids, arthropods and all vertebrates are made of segments. He called the origin of segmentation a great problem of speculative morphology3. He contrasted two conceptions of the segment. In one, segmentation is a modified form of agamic reproduction, and each segment is a zooid that is integrated into the whole. Child objected that the theories had been morphological rather than physiological. He also found the mesodermal theory hard to defend on physiological grounds4.

03

Gap genes and domain borders

In Drosophila, maternal gradients set the polarity of the embryo. The gap genes hunchback, Krüppel, knirps and giant are among their earliest targets. They are expressed in broad, overlapping domains6. Manu and colleagues (2009) measured domain borders against the Bicoid gradient. The Bicoid threshold position varied with a standard deviation of 4.6% egg length.

04

Evolving the networks

Ten Tusscher and Hogeweg (2011) tested an idea that had been repeatedly argued. The idea was that modularity of gene regulatory networks is key to increased body plan complexity8. They ran simulations that selected independently for segmentation and differentiation, which they describe as major innovations in metazoan evolution. They ran 50 simulations. They analysed whether segments and domains evolved sequentially or together, and what network architecture and dynamics resulted8. They report two distinct evolutionary strategies.

SourcesEach quotation was checked word for word against the passage it opens.
  1. Arthropoda, variation in number of segments, 87; Homo-osis in appendages, llti; axial duplicity, 565Bateson, W., 1894 · Materials for the Study of Variation Treated with Especial Regard to… · open at passage 1720
  2. New segments are now formed just in front of the terminal segment, the youngest being the one next to the end-segment. The process continues until the full complement of segments is made upMorgan, T. H., 1901 · Regeneration · open at passage 26
  3. The bodies of the annelids and arthropods among the invertebrates and the bodies of all vertebrates are made up of segments, metameres, or somitesChild, C. M., 1921 · The Origin and Development of the Nervous System · open at passage 213
  4. The theories of segmentation have been primarily morphological rather than physiological.Child, C. M., 1921 · The Origin and Development of the Nervous System · open at passage 215
  5. (d) A still higher stage in metameric segmentation is seen in the differentiated (heteronymous) segmentation of insects.Rádl, E., 1930 · The History of Biological Theories · open at passage 747
  6. The trunk gap genes, hunchback (hb), Krüppel (Kr), knirps (kni), and giant (gt), are among the earliest targets of these maternal gradients. They show broad, overlapping expression domainsPerkins TJ, Jaeger J, Reinitz J, Glass L, 2006 · Reverse engineering the gap gene network of Drosophila melanogaster · open at passage 1
  7. In our data σBcd = 4.6% egg length (EL), whereas gap gene domain border positions have σ ∼ 1% EL [6].Manu, Surkova S, Spirov AV, Gursky VV, Janssens H, Kim AR…, 2009 · Canalization of gene expression in the Drosophila blastoderm by gap gene cross… · open at passage 5
  8. It has been repeatedly argued that key to the evolution of increased body plan complexity is the modularity of the underlying developmental gene regulatory networks (GRNs).Ten Tusscher KH, Hogeweg P, 2011 · Evolution of networks for body plan patterning; interplay of modularity… · open at passage 0
  9. the amount of data required for reverse engineering is much lower than previously thought.Crombach A, Wotton KR, Cicin-Sain D, Ashyraliyev M, Jaeger J, 2012 · Efficient reverse-engineering of a developmental gene regulatory network · open at passage 74
Linked ideas
The Drosophila gap gene system is the best measured case of expression domains forming segmental pattern.
Takes up the modularity claim that Ten Tusscher and Hogeweg tested by simulation.
Explains how domain borders stay precise despite variable maternal gradients.
Covers how gradients such as Bicoid are read to place domain borders.
Evolvabilityrelated to
Modularity is argued to support evolvability, the property the network simulations examine.
Regenerationprecursor of / follows
Morgan's work on segment replacement in annelids is an early view of segment addition.
Passages discuss vertebrate segmentation via the clock-and-wavefront model and Notch/hairy oscillations, which fits both pages' segmentation theme; none address identity-domain assignment or evolutionary models directly.
Where it is discussedPassages matching segments and domains, segmentation, body plan patterning, evolved segments
1894Materials for the Study of Variation Treated with Especial Regard to… · Bateson, W.180
1992On Growth and Form · Thompson, D. A. W.73
1900Comparative Physiology of the Brain and Comparative Psychology · Loeb, J.72
1896The Cell in Development and Inheritance · Wilson, E. B.68
1906The Integrative Action of the Nervous System · Sherrington, C. S.63
1901Regeneration · Morgan, T. H.61
2011Evolution of networks for body plan patterning; interplay of modularity… · Ten Tusscher KH, Hogeweg P52
1930The History of Biological Theories · Rádl, E.32
1921The Origin and Development of the Nervous System · Child, C. M.30
1916The Organism as a Whole, from a Physicochemical Viewpoint · Loeb, J.28