Evolution of segmentation and expression domains in body plan patterning
Segmentation is the repetition of body units along an axis. Expression domains are the regions of an embryo where particular genes are active. Early authors catalogued segments and asked how they arose. Later work in Drosophila measured how gene domains form and how precisely their borders are placed. Recent simulations ask how networks that make segments and domains can evolve368.
- Earliest held
- 1859, Darwin
- Most discussed in
- Materials for the Study of Variation Treated…, 1894
- In the library
- 979 passages in 89 works
- Rewritten
- 2026-10-28
Early observations
Bateson's 1894 catalogue of variation indexed changes in the number of segments in arthropods, alongside homoeosis in appendages and axial duplicity1. Morgan (1901) described how annelids regenerate. In regeneration from the posterior end of a piece of an earthworm, new segments form just in front of the terminal segment, and the youngest lies next to it. The process continues until the full complement is made up2. Rádl (1930) summarised the classification of the evolutionary morphologists. In that classification, differentiated segmentation in insects is a higher stage than the simple repetition seen in annelids5.
Competing theories of origin
Child (1921) noted that annelids, arthropods and all vertebrates are made of segments. He called the origin of segmentation a great problem of speculative morphology3. He contrasted two conceptions of the segment. In one, segmentation is a modified form of agamic reproduction, and each segment is a zooid that is integrated into the whole. Child objected that the theories had been morphological rather than physiological. He also found the mesodermal theory hard to defend on physiological grounds4.
Gap genes and domain borders
In Drosophila, maternal gradients set the polarity of the embryo. The gap genes hunchback, Krüppel, knirps and giant are among their earliest targets. They are expressed in broad, overlapping domains6. Manu and colleagues (2009) measured domain borders against the Bicoid gradient. The Bicoid threshold position varied with a standard deviation of 4.6% egg length.
Evolving the networks
Ten Tusscher and Hogeweg (2011) tested an idea that had been repeatedly argued. The idea was that modularity of gene regulatory networks is key to increased body plan complexity8. They ran simulations that selected independently for segmentation and differentiation, which they describe as major innovations in metazoan evolution. They ran 50 simulations. They analysed whether segments and domains evolved sequentially or together, and what network architecture and dynamics resulted8. They report two distinct evolutionary strategies.
Arthropoda, variation in number of segments, 87; Homo-osis in appendages, llti; axial duplicity, 565
Bateson, W., 1894 · Materials for the Study of Variation Treated with Especial Regard to… · open at passage 1720New segments are now formed just in front of the terminal segment, the youngest being the one next to the end-segment. The process continues until the full complement of segments is made up
Morgan, T. H., 1901 · Regeneration · open at passage 26The bodies of the annelids and arthropods among the invertebrates and the bodies of all vertebrates are made up of segments, metameres, or somites
Child, C. M., 1921 · The Origin and Development of the Nervous System · open at passage 213The theories of segmentation have been primarily morphological rather than physiological.
Child, C. M., 1921 · The Origin and Development of the Nervous System · open at passage 215(d) A still higher stage in metameric segmentation is seen in the differentiated (heteronymous) segmentation of insects.
Rádl, E., 1930 · The History of Biological Theories · open at passage 747The trunk gap genes, hunchback (hb), Krüppel (Kr), knirps (kni), and giant (gt), are among the earliest targets of these maternal gradients. They show broad, overlapping expression domains
Perkins TJ, Jaeger J, Reinitz J, Glass L, 2006 · Reverse engineering the gap gene network of Drosophila melanogaster · open at passage 1In our data σBcd = 4.6% egg length (EL), whereas gap gene domain border positions have σ ∼ 1% EL [6].
Manu, Surkova S, Spirov AV, Gursky VV, Janssens H, Kim AR…, 2009 · Canalization of gene expression in the Drosophila blastoderm by gap gene cross… · open at passage 5It has been repeatedly argued that key to the evolution of increased body plan complexity is the modularity of the underlying developmental gene regulatory networks (GRNs).
Ten Tusscher KH, Hogeweg P, 2011 · Evolution of networks for body plan patterning; interplay of modularity… · open at passage 0the amount of data required for reverse engineering is much lower than previously thought.
Crombach A, Wotton KR, Cicin-Sain D, Ashyraliyev M, Jaeger J, 2012 · Efficient reverse-engineering of a developmental gene regulatory network · open at passage 74
| 1894 | Materials for the Study of Variation Treated with Especial Regard to… · Bateson, W. | 180 |
| 1992 | On Growth and Form · Thompson, D. A. W. | 73 |
| 1900 | Comparative Physiology of the Brain and Comparative Psychology · Loeb, J. | 72 |
| 1896 | The Cell in Development and Inheritance · Wilson, E. B. | 68 |
| 1906 | The Integrative Action of the Nervous System · Sherrington, C. S. | 63 |
| 1901 | Regeneration · Morgan, T. H. | 61 |
| 2011 | Evolution of networks for body plan patterning; interplay of modularity… · Ten Tusscher KH, Hogeweg P | 52 |
| 1930 | The History of Biological Theories · Rádl, E. | 32 |
| 1921 | The Origin and Development of the Nervous System · Child, C. M. | 30 |
| 1916 | The Organism as a Whole, from a Physicochemical Viewpoint · Loeb, J. | 28 |