Physiology and the whole organism  ·  Article

Friction, elastic impact and the fate of living force (vis viva)

In mechanics, friction was treated as a force opposing motion, and living force (vis viva) was taken to be lost in friction and in elastic impact. Helmholtz, in 1847, called this an incomplete account and asked whether the heat and electricity produced make up the loss.123 Later authors used friction to model damping, delay and heat production in living systems.457

Earliest held
1847, Helmholtz, H.
Most discussed in
Principles of General Physiology, 1915
In the library
225 passages in 36 works
Rewritten
2026-10-29
01

Helmholtz's objection

In Über die Erhaltung der Kraft (1847), Helmholtz noted that mechanics usually presents friction as a force opposing existing motion, with an intensity that depends on velocity.1 He called this a calculating device and a very incomplete description of a complicated process in which many molecular forces interact.1 From that view it followed that living force was absolutely lost in friction, and the same was assumed for elastic impact.2 Helmholtz replied that the heat gained, and the electricity usually produced, are themselves forces that can yield mechanical effects. He therefore left open whether their sum always equals the mechanical force lost.3

02

Friction as a model

Bose (1902) studied a torsional pendulum struck by a blow and varied its friction by raising a vessel of sand against it. More friction damped the oscillation and gave recovery curves he compared with those of nerve, muscle, plant and metal.4 Bayliss (1915) used a weight on glass as a model of a catalyst. Friction can be so great that no movement shows until oil is applied. He said the question was nearly one of words, since the weight may move and be arrested again.5 Lotka (1925) placed systems with both inertia and friction between free and fully damped systems. Their action may resemble a pendulum swinging in air, and typically their history shows damped oscillations.6

03

Heat in muscle

Hill (1926) described reversible temperature changes in stretched or released muscle, first described by Kelvin, and found them in resting muscle. He also found large irreversible heat production when a muscle was stretched or released.7 Hill tied this heat only to the frictional transformation of mechanical energy into heat in a viscous system. It led him to the hypothesis that the energy loss he needed to explain was largely due to such frictional causes.7

04

Friction in free-energy models

Friston and Ao (2012) treat friction within a mathematical account of free energy, value and attractors. In their formulation it appears as a motion-dependent reduction in the rate of change of velocity. They state that friction is an emergent property of random fluctuations in velocity and nothing more.8 Here friction is not an extra force added to the dynamics. It follows from the random fluctuations the model already contains.

SourcesEach quotation was checked word for word against the passage it opens.
  1. Man pflegt in der Mechanik die Reibung als eine Kraft dar- zustellen, welche der vorliandenen Bewegung entgegenwirkt, und deren Intensitat eine Function der Geschwindigkeit ist.Helmholtz, H., 1847 · Über die Erhaltung der Kraft · open at passage 40
  2. Aus jener Auffassung folgte, dass bei der Reibung lebendige Kraft absolut verloren ginge, ebenso nahm man es beim elastisclien Stosse an.Helmholtz, H., 1847 · Über die Erhaltung der Kraft · open at passage 40
  3. Es bliebe also [27] zu fragen ttbrig, ob die Summe dieser Krafte im- mer der verlorenen meckanisclien Kraft entspricht.Helmholtz, H., 1847 · Über die Erhaltung der Kraft · open at passage 40
  4. If the friction is increased, there is a damping of oscillation. In (ce) we get recovery-curves similar to those found in nerve, muscle, plant, and metal.Bose, J. C., 1902 · Response in the Living and Non-Living · open at passage 210
  5. The friction between the weight and the glass may be so great that no movement appears to take place until oil is applied.Bayliss, W. M., 1915 · Principles of General Physiology · open at passage 1347
  6. Their action may resemble that of a pendulum swinging in air; typically the history of such a system exhibits the phenomenon of damped oscillations, a periodicity over which there is superimposed the dying away of the motion.Lotka, A. J., 1925 · Elements of Physical Biology · open at passage 145
  7. These could be associated only with the frictional transformation of mechanical energy into heat in a viscous system, and they led us to the hypothesis that the loss of energy which we required was due largely to such frictional causes.Hill, A. V., 1926 · Muscular Activity · open at passage 14
  8. Note that friction is an emergent property of random fluctuations in velocity (and nothing more).Friston K, Ao P, 2012 · Free energy, value, and attractors · open at passage 56
Linked ideas
Helmholtz's question about where lost living force goes is the setting in which energy conservation was argued.
Heat gained in friction and impact is the equivalent Helmholtz asked to match against mechanical force lost.
Absolute loss of living force versus its conversion bears on whether motion can be created or destroyed.
Friston and Ao derive friction as an emergent property of random fluctuations within this framework.
Bose varied friction in a pendulum to reproduce response and recovery curves like those of living tissue.
Where it is discussedPassages matching Reibung, lebendige Kraft, friction, inelastic collision
1915Principles of General Physiology · Bayliss, W. M.34
1847Über die Erhaltung der Kraft · Helmholtz, H.25
1992On Growth and Form · Thompson, D. A. W.21
1918Life Movements in Plants · Bose, J. C.16
1925Elements of Physical Biology · Lotka, A. J.12
1926The Nervous Mechanism of Plants · Bose, J. C.11
1906Plant Response as a Means of Physiological Investigation · Bose, J. C.10
1928The Motor Mechanism of Plants · Bose, J. C.10
1913Researches on Irritability of Plants · Bose, J. C.10
1923The Physiology of the Ascent of Sap · Bose, J. C.10