Galvanic current, muscle tension and electrical orientation of swimming (galvanotropism in animals)
Galvanotropism is the forced orientation of an animal in a galvanic current. Jacques Loeb studied it in the shrimp Palaemonetes and argued that the current alters the tension of antagonist muscles, so that movement toward one electrode becomes easy and movement toward the other becomes hard12. He treated it as a physical process, not a purposeful behaviour7.
- Earliest held
- 1900, Loeb, J.
- Most discussed in
- Forced Movements, Tropisms, and Animal Conduct, 1918
- In the library
- 55 passages in 11 works
- Rewritten
- 2026-11-06
The shrimp experiments
In 1900 Loeb described what happens when a current is sent through Palaemonetes from head to tail. The swimming appendages and the tail are stretched backward to their fullest extent1. He took this to show that the muscles moving those organs backward have more tension than their antagonists1. The shrimp then swims toward the anode easily and backward only with difficulty2. When the current runs from tail to head, the appendages turn forward and the animal swims backward easily1. Loeb also noted that the tail fin behaves like the abdominal appendages and not like the body1.
Orientation and locomotion
In 1906 Loeb separated two effects of the current. Sessile organs show only a galvanotropic curvature3. Wherever the current affects the locomotive organs of a free-swimming animal, swimming toward the cathode or the anode must occur as well as the orientation3. Loeb cited the infusorian Paramecium as an example3. In the same year Bose reported work by Greely on Paramecium. Alkali-reared animals invariably first swam toward the kathode, while acid-reared animals generally did the reverse4. Bose linked this to the opposite effects of acids and alkalis4.
A mechanical theory
By 1918 Loeb stated the theory in general form. All galvanotropic phenomena were reduced to changes in the tension of associated muscles or contractile elements7. Galvanotropism was therefore a forced motion, produced by the current instead of by injury to the brain7. He then asked how a current produces such changes. He answered that currents pass through tissue as ions, and that membranes more permeable to some salts than to others block their progress7.
Use, selection and later reading
Loeb used galvanotropism as an argument against explaining tropisms by natural selection. He held that it is purely a laboratory phenomenon, since no animal meets such a current outside the laboratory, yet it is common56. In 1916 he said this puzzled the selectionist, the Lamarckian and the vitalist alike6. Gershman and colleagues (2021) describe Loeb's tropism view as influential in early protozoan study. They say he and his students treated many movements as reactions to an asymmetric force8. Pietak and Levin (2016) list galvanotropism of cells as a missing component among the current limitations of their BETSE model9.
This proves that the tension of the muscles that move those organs back- wards is greater than that of their antagonists.
Loeb, J., 1900 · Comparative Physiology of the Brain and Comparative Psychology · open at passage 248The shrimp can thus swim forwards toward the anode easily under the influence of such a current, but back- wards only with difficulty.
Loeb, J., 1900 · Comparative Physiology of the Brain and Comparative Psychology · open at passage 248Wherever the current affects the locomotive organs of a free- swimming animal, besides the galvanotropic orientation of the animal, a swimming either toward the cathode or anode must occur.
Loeb, J., 1906 · The Dynamics of Living Matter · open at passage 384Greely has found that while alkali-reared Paramcecia invariably give the initial response by swimming towards the kathode, the reverse is generally the case with those which have been subjected to acid
Bose, J. C., 1906 · Plant Response as a Means of Physiological Investigation · open at passage 1616Galvanotropism is purely a laboratory phenomenon; outside of the laboratory no animal ever comes into a situation which might call forth a galvanotropic reaction
Loeb, J., 1906 · The Dynamics of Living Matter · open at passage 425galvanotropism is purely a laboratory product and no animal has ever had a chance or will ever have a chance to be exposed to a constant current except in the laboratory of a scientist.
Loeb, J., 1916 · The Organism as a Whole, from a Physicochemical Viewpoint · open at passage 484All the phenomena of galvanotropism are, therefore, reduced to changes in the tension of associated muscles or contractile elements, as a consequence of which the motion of the organism toward one pole is facilitated
Loeb, J., 1918 · Forced Movements, Tropisms, and Animal Conduct · open at passage 68galvanotaxic movement of cells and galvanotropism in response to endogenous, global electric fields, is another key component of bioelectric pattern regulation
Pietak A, Levin M, 2016 · Exploring Instructive Physiological Signaling with the Bioelectric Tissue… · open at passage 139Loeb and his students applied this concept more broadly to algae and animals, arguing that many movements could be conceptualized as reactions to an asymmetrically impinging force
Gershman SJ, Balbi PE, Gallistel CR, Gunawardena J, 2021 · Reconsidering the evidence for learning in single cells · open at passage 10
| 1918 | Forced Movements, Tropisms, and Animal Conduct · Loeb, J. | 14 |
| 1906 | The Dynamics of Living Matter · Loeb, J. | 10 |
| 1900 | Comparative Physiology of the Brain and Comparative Psychology · Loeb, J. | 9 |
| 1912 | The Mechanistic Conception of Life · Loeb, J. | 6 |
| 1916 | The Organism as a Whole, from a Physicochemical Viewpoint · Loeb, J. | 5 |
| 1906 | Behavior of the Lower Organisms · Jennings, H. S. | 3 |
| 1906 | Plant Response as a Means of Physiological Investigation · Bose, J. C. | 3 |
| 1923 | Protoplasmic Action and Nervous Action · Lillie, R. S. | 2 |
| 2016 | Exploring Instructive Physiological Signaling with the Bioelectric Tissue… · Pietak A, Levin M | 1 |
| 2021 | Reconsidering the evidence for learning in single cells · Gershman SJ, Balbi PE, Gallistel CR… | 1 |