Minds of small things  ·  Article

Trial and error

Trial and error is the idea that an organism meets a difficulty by producing varied movements and keeping those that relieve it. H. S. Jennings gave it this form for simple animals in 1906.1 Driesch, Loeb and Child questioned or contrasted it with other accounts.346 Later authors use the term for learning and for evolution.78

Earliest held
1906, Jennings, H. S.
Most discussed in
Behavior of the Lower Organisms, 1906
In the library
179 passages in 15 works
Rewritten
2026-10-06
01

Jennings's formulation

In Behavior of the Lower Organisms (1906), Jennings named three significant features of behavior. One was reaction by varied or overproduced movements, with selection from the conditions those movements produce.1 Jennings called this reaction by selection of overproduced movements and described it as the constructive one of two mainsprings for the development of behavior.1 Its effectiveness depends in part on how fit the movements are to relieve the organism from unfavorable conditions.2 Jennings gave an example: against a diffusing chemical, the rapid movements of Paramecium are more likely to save the animal than the slow motion of Amoeba.2

02

Objections from Driesch and Loeb

Driesch (1908) found the term appropriate for an experiment described by Yerkes, where a series of trials and errors becomes an immediate reaction on a second stimulus.3 Driesch thought it unjustified where there is no objectified experience, since no criterion shows that a state is liked in lower animals.3 Loeb rejected the idea more sharply. Of the claim that worms move by heliotropism in strong light and by trial and error in weak light, Loeb compared it to saying a stone falls by gravity while a feather finds its way down by trial and error.4 Loeb also reported that Jennings and Mast put all such orientations under trial and error, and asked whether Euglena was closer to random selection or to the direct orientation of amphipods.5

03

Later uses of the term

Child (1924) contrasted the two patterns. Trial and error depends on the absence of mechanisms for direct orientation, while the tropism theory postulates such mechanisms in all reacting organisms.6 Watson and colleagues (2016) describe reinforcement learning as modifying connections at random and keeping changes that improve the output, and say this is equivalent in effect to natural selection.7 Newman (2019) argues that inherency of form and function does much of the work the standard model gives to trial-and-error-based natural selection.8 Trewavas (2025) cites Jennings and later studies for the claim that Stentor uses trial and error learning.9

SourcesEach quotation was checked word for word against the passage it opens.
  1. reaction by varied or overproduced movements, with selection from the varied conditions resulting from these movementsJennings, H. S., 1906 · Behavior of the Lower Organisms · open at passage 872
  2. the relative fitness of the movements to relieve the organism from the unfavorable conditionsJennings, H. S., 1906 · Behavior of the Lower Organisms · open at passage 854
  3. unjustified to speak of trial and error when there is no objectified experienceDriesch, H., 1908 · The Science and Philosophy of the Organism · open at passage 243
  4. as erroneous as the assertion that while a stone falls under the influence of gravity a feather finds its way down by the method ofLoeb, J., 1918 · Forced Movements, Tropisms, and Animal Conduct · open at passage 278
  5. include all such orientations under trial and error and contrast them with the direct orientation of such animals as the amphipodsLoeb, J., 1918 · Forced Movements, Tropisms, and Animal Conduct · open at passage 118
  6. the trial-and-error method of reaction to any particular factor depends on the absence of mechanisms which provide for immediate, direct, or in the higher animals and man, conscious and intelligent orientationChild, C. M., 1924 · Physiological Foundations of Behavior · open at passage 595
  7. This can be as simple as modifying connections at random and retaining modifications that improve the output.Watson RA, Mills R, Buckley CL, Kouvaris K, Jackson A…, 2016 · Evolutionary Connectionism: Algorithmic Principles Underlying the Evolution of… · open at passage 36
  8. Inherency clearly does much of the work attributed in the standard model to trial-and-error-based natural selection.Newman SA, 2019 · Inherency of Form and Function in Animal Development and Evolution · open at passage 70
  9. Stentor uses trial and error learning in constructing intentional behaviourTrewavas A, 2025 · Plant intelligence dux: a comprehensive rebuttal of Kingsland and Taiz · open at passage 6
Linked ideas
Jennings builds the idea from the movements of Paramecium and Amoeba, and compares how effective their differing movements are at escaping unfavourable conditions.
Tropismin tension with
Child's note pairs the tropism theory (Loeb) with the trial-and-error theory (Jennings) as rival accounts of animal behaviour.
Washburn's most common criterion, modified behaviour after individual experience, is the kind of evidence trial-and-error learning supplies.
Washburn's maze studies concern how habits form and how earlier habits help or hinder new ones, the learning side of habit.
Loeb says life phenomena unequivocally determined by physicochemical conditions yield constant quantitative results, and rejects animal movements being voluntary or dictated by Jennings' 'trial and error'; Child describes it as random movements.
The Y-maze rewards food at one branch and measures later choices, a learning test comparable to trial-and-error work.
Memory in planariaprecursor of / follows
Jennings read the planarian's head-waving and testing movements as varied behaviour that samples conditions, an early account of behaviour that can later be modified.
Loeb and Driesch each treated the term as a test of whether behavior needs more than physicochemical explanation.
Thompson uses trial and error as a drawing method for fitting coordinate systems to sections, a procedural sense of the phrase.
Operant and instrumental learning depend on consequences, while classical conditioning pairs stimuli.
Exploratory adaptation is a search by random variation and retention, much as trial and error is, though here the search runs in connection strengths.
Selection among varied candidates and trial-and-error within an organism are both processes of keeping what works.
Forced-movement accounts leave little room for trial and error, and Jennings's stress on direction of motion points the other way.
Fields and Levin note that minimizing free energy requires probing the environment by perturbing it, which resembles exploratory trial behaviour.
Sampling options and then committing to one is a structured form of trial and error.
Newman argues that inherency, not gradual trial-and-error selection, accounts for much of the evolution of form and function.
Basal cognitionrelated to
Trewavas uses Jennings's trial and error in protozoa as evidence for intelligence in simple organisms.
Blackiston and colleagues contrast random trial-and-error search of design space with following gradients toward optimal designs.
Reinforcement learning is described as learning by trial and error and reward, which the active inference accounts claim not to need.
Where it is discussedPassages matching trial and error, avoiding reaction, selection of movements, overproduced movements
1906Behavior of the Lower Organisms · Jennings, H. S.133
1924Physiological Foundations of Behavior · Child, C. M.13
1908The Animal Mind: A Textbook of Comparative Psychology · Washburn, M. F.9
1918Forced Movements, Tropisms, and Animal Conduct · Loeb, J.5
1916The Organism as a Whole, from a Physicochemical Viewpoint · Loeb, J.3
1908The Science and Philosophy of the Organism · Driesch, H.3
2016Evolutionary Connectionism: Algorithmic Principles Underlying the Evolution of… · Watson RA, Mills R, Buckley CL…2
2025Plant intelligence dux: a comprehensive rebuttal of Kingsland and Taiz · Trewavas A2
2019Inherency of Form and Function in Animal Development and Evolution · Newman SA2
1912The Mechanistic Conception of Life · Loeb, J.2