Trial and error
Trial and error is the idea that an organism meets a difficulty by producing varied movements and keeping those that relieve it. H. S. Jennings gave it this form for simple animals in 1906.1 Driesch, Loeb and Child questioned or contrasted it with other accounts.346 Later authors use the term for learning and for evolution.78
- Earliest held
- 1906, Jennings, H. S.
- Most discussed in
- Behavior of the Lower Organisms, 1906
- In the library
- 179 passages in 15 works
- Rewritten
- 2026-10-06
Jennings's formulation
In Behavior of the Lower Organisms (1906), Jennings named three significant features of behavior. One was reaction by varied or overproduced movements, with selection from the conditions those movements produce.1 Jennings called this reaction by selection of overproduced movements and described it as the constructive one of two mainsprings for the development of behavior.1 Its effectiveness depends in part on how fit the movements are to relieve the organism from unfavorable conditions.2 Jennings gave an example: against a diffusing chemical, the rapid movements of Paramecium are more likely to save the animal than the slow motion of Amoeba.2
Objections from Driesch and Loeb
Driesch (1908) found the term appropriate for an experiment described by Yerkes, where a series of trials and errors becomes an immediate reaction on a second stimulus.3 Driesch thought it unjustified where there is no objectified experience, since no criterion shows that a state is liked in lower animals.3 Loeb rejected the idea more sharply. Of the claim that worms move by heliotropism in strong light and by trial and error in weak light, Loeb compared it to saying a stone falls by gravity while a feather finds its way down by trial and error.4 Loeb also reported that Jennings and Mast put all such orientations under trial and error, and asked whether Euglena was closer to random selection or to the direct orientation of amphipods.5
Later uses of the term
Child (1924) contrasted the two patterns. Trial and error depends on the absence of mechanisms for direct orientation, while the tropism theory postulates such mechanisms in all reacting organisms.6 Watson and colleagues (2016) describe reinforcement learning as modifying connections at random and keeping changes that improve the output, and say this is equivalent in effect to natural selection.7 Newman (2019) argues that inherency of form and function does much of the work the standard model gives to trial-and-error-based natural selection.8 Trewavas (2025) cites Jennings and later studies for the claim that Stentor uses trial and error learning.9
reaction by varied or overproduced movements, with selection from the varied conditions resulting from these movements
Jennings, H. S., 1906 · Behavior of the Lower Organisms · open at passage 872the relative fitness of the movements to relieve the organism from the unfavorable conditions
Jennings, H. S., 1906 · Behavior of the Lower Organisms · open at passage 854unjustified to speak of trial and error when there is no objectified experience
Driesch, H., 1908 · The Science and Philosophy of the Organism · open at passage 243as erroneous as the assertion that while a stone falls under the influence of gravity a feather finds its way down by the method of
Loeb, J., 1918 · Forced Movements, Tropisms, and Animal Conduct · open at passage 278include all such orientations under trial and error and contrast them with the direct orientation of such animals as the amphipods
Loeb, J., 1918 · Forced Movements, Tropisms, and Animal Conduct · open at passage 118the trial-and-error method of reaction to any particular factor depends on the absence of mechanisms which provide for immediate, direct, or in the higher animals and man, conscious and intelligent orientation
Child, C. M., 1924 · Physiological Foundations of Behavior · open at passage 595This can be as simple as modifying connections at random and retaining modifications that improve the output.
Watson RA, Mills R, Buckley CL, Kouvaris K, Jackson A…, 2016 · Evolutionary Connectionism: Algorithmic Principles Underlying the Evolution of… · open at passage 36Inherency clearly does much of the work attributed in the standard model to trial-and-error-based natural selection.
Newman SA, 2019 · Inherency of Form and Function in Animal Development and Evolution · open at passage 70Stentor uses trial and error learning in constructing intentional behaviour
Trewavas A, 2025 · Plant intelligence dux: a comprehensive rebuttal of Kingsland and Taiz · open at passage 6
| 1906 | Behavior of the Lower Organisms · Jennings, H. S. | 133 |
| 1924 | Physiological Foundations of Behavior · Child, C. M. | 13 |
| 1908 | The Animal Mind: A Textbook of Comparative Psychology · Washburn, M. F. | 9 |
| 1918 | Forced Movements, Tropisms, and Animal Conduct · Loeb, J. | 5 |
| 1916 | The Organism as a Whole, from a Physicochemical Viewpoint · Loeb, J. | 3 |
| 1908 | The Science and Philosophy of the Organism · Driesch, H. | 3 |
| 2016 | Evolutionary Connectionism: Algorithmic Principles Underlying the Evolution of… · Watson RA, Mills R, Buckley CL… | 2 |
| 2025 | Plant intelligence dux: a comprehensive rebuttal of Kingsland and Taiz · Trewavas A | 2 |
| 2019 | Inherency of Form and Function in Animal Development and Evolution · Newman SA | 2 |
| 1912 | The Mechanistic Conception of Life · Loeb, J. | 2 |